Product strategy & MVP development
Deciding what to build first, and being willing to argue about it.
- Disciplines
- Stages
- Duration
An MVP is not a smaller version of the full product.
It is the smallest thing that can prove or kill the assumption the business is resting on. Those are different objects, and the difference between them is usually a quarter of runway.
This line is where we are most likely to disagree with you in the first month, and where that disagreement is worth the most.
What is in scope
- MVP design and rapid prototyping
- Product thinking and feature prioritisation
- User journey mapping and experience architecture
- Conversion-focused design
- Data-informed product decisions
The order the work runs in
Stages, not a schedule. We do not publish durations we have not agreed with you — the sequence is fixed, the length depends on what we find in scoping.
- 01
Assumption
- 02
Scope
- 03
Prototype
- 04
Build
- 05
Read
What you have at the end
- A written scope, with an explicit out-of-scope list
- Prioritised feature set with the reasoning attached
- Journey maps for the paths that matter
- A working, instrumented MVP
- An analytics plan tied to the assumption being tested
What we will argue with you about
Scope, in week one. Almost every MVP brief we see contains two products. Cutting one of them is the single highest-value thing that happens in a strategy engagement, and it is uncomfortable every time.
We will also push to keep the admin panel ugly. It is the most common place an MVP budget quietly disappears, and no user will ever see it.
